For those that do no fap and/or deeply religious are the things mentioned in this video true:
This video makes some very big assumptions: that there is indeed a Tree of Life or even a Garden of Eden, and that Adam and Eve are supposedly real...or even symbolically legit figures.
Another major bias of this video is that it makes the orgasm look bad simply because it is energy that is," wasted" as the narrator states...the thing is...orgasm is orgasm, it is neither good nor bad...it is a, "comfortable" feeling. Is seeking comfort and pleasure bad, or is the whole concept of good and bad some concocted b.s?
How is one supposed to create a new soul if the man does not "invoke the serpent"? The video does not explain what divine method can procreate without resorting to orgasm.
It contradicts itself by first saying sex got us into trouble in the first place and later saying that sex is a necessary part of nature, and sex is good but you don't need the orgasm. Where does natural biology come in the picture here?
This video makes some very big assumptions: that there is indeed a Tree of Life or even a Garden of Eden, and that Adam and Eve are supposedly real...or even symbolically legit figures.
Another major bias of this video is that it makes the orgasm look bad simply because it is energy that is," wasted" as the narrator states...the thing is...orgasm is orgasm, it is neither good nor bad...it is a, "comfortable" feeling. Is seeking comfort and pleasure bad, or is the whole concept of good and bad some concocted b.s?
How is one supposed to create a new soul if the man does not "invoke the serpent"? The video does not explain what divine method can procreate without resorting to orgasm.
It contradicts itself by first saying sex got us into trouble in the first place and later saying that sex is a necessary part of nature, and sex is good but you don't need the orgasm. Where does natural biology come in the picture here?