more mummys tested and shows prominent east african origin..

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

In 2013, Nature announced the publication of the first genetic study utilizing next-generation sequencing to ascertain the ancestral lineage of an Ancient Egyptian individual. The research was led by Carsten Pusch of the University of Tübingen in Germany and Rabab Khairat, who released their findings in the Journal of Applied Genetics. DNA was extracted from the heads of five Egyptian mummies that were housed at the institution. All the specimens were dated between 806 BC and 124 AD, a timeframe corresponding with the late Dynastic period. The researchers observed that one of the mummified individuals likely belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup I2, a maternal clade that is believed to have originated in Western Asia.

basically the mummys were tested and most likely belonged to Haplogroup I (mtDNA), which is of east African origin..

black excellence bruhs..

sources:
Khairat, R. et al. J. Appl. Genet. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13353-013-0145-1 (2013).
The researchers, led by Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, published their findings last week in the Journal of Applied Genetics1
http://www.nature.com/news/egyptian-mummies-yield-genetic-secrets-1.12793#/b1

 

[tmonster]

aliens!

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Not saying I disagree but the article says western asia it doesn't mention east africa, if anything it's trying to distance egypt from africa...

 

[Sinnerman]

Haplogroup 1 possibly originates in west asia according to the article. however it is found in the highest frequencies in east african populations after a quick google search

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Haplogroup 1 possibly originates in west asia according to the article. however it is found in the highest frequencies in east african populations after a quick google search

no doubt. I'm just saying I always associated western asians with arabs and it seems like that was the angle the article was coming from.

 

[Poitier]

"All the specimens were dated between 806 BC and 124 AD, a timeframe corresponding with the late Dynastic period"

No one really cares about that time period and at this point, any person with a semblance of intelligence isn't debating the origins of the people of AE

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

"All the specimens were dated between 806 BC and 124 AD, a timeframe corresponding with the late Dynastic period"

No one really cares about that time period and at this point, any person with a semblance of intelligence isn't debating the origins of the people of AE

the 806 ranging is actually projected at that amount but the dating actually ranged from 1130 - 806. bc they just summed it down..

also this period is not really clear because "the younger lady" is supposed to be dated around 1330 bc but it says specimens are dated from 806 bc to 136 ad..

and also they say the origin is possibly western asia, although the haplogroup clearly signifies more of a east african origin..

kinda seems like they are bullshytting..

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

Haplogroup 1 possibly originates in west asia according to the article. however it is found in the highest frequencies in east african populations after a quick google search

lol they think they slick...

 

[88m3]

Haplogroup 1 possibly originates in west asia according to the article. however it is found in the highest frequencies in east african populations after a quick google search

Jews

 

[MaLi]

“It would be nice to know more about the origins of the ancient Egyptians,” says Pusch. “Where did they come from? Where did they go? Are there still traces of ancestral DNA in today’s Egypt?”








Anyway, I'm surprised that these mummies have considerable amounts of east African dna.
The last African rulers lost control of Kemet to the Assyrians, who then lost to the Persians, who then lost to the Greeks all between 700bc-300bc. That being said, native Africans could still be in positions of power during these periods, and the general population was probably a mix of natives, foreigners. and multi-continental offspring

 

[Blackking]

Why do we even need these 'findings' to tell us what we already know? Let cac and 'others' remain in denial.

 

[Sinnerman]

Jews

 

[MaLi]

Why do we even need these 'findings' to tell us what we already know? Let cac and 'others' remain in denial.

We don't necessarily need these findings to tell us, but we do need our people to conduct the research with our own funding so the general population isn't misguided. Imagine how easy it was/is for "other" researchers, scientists, archeologists, theologians, anthropologists to sway the evidence one way or another.

Yesterday it was lightening skin tones, destroying and defacing artifacts.
Today its changing definitions, separating tribes, and withholding evidence.
Tomorrow it could be "accidentally" contaminating or altering dna

It isn't always about what we know. Its about controlling how the information is accessed, used, and eventually shared to the masses

 

[Camile.Bidan]

Modern day east africans generally have Mtdna L3. Mtdna I is more arabic. I have mTdna L3, which can be traced to Fulani tribes. Oddly, the fula people more like east africans than their west africans neighbors.


This doesn't mean the Mtdna L dominated east africa in that time though. Haplogroup frequency can change quite quickly. america was dominated by Native haplogroups at one point in time.

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

“It would be nice to know more about the origins of the ancient Egyptians,” says Pusch. “Where did they come from? Where did they go? Are there still traces of ancestral DNA in today’s Egypt?”








Anyway, I'm surprised that these mummies have considerable amounts of east African dna.
The last African rulers lost control of Kemet to the Assyrians, who then lost to the Persians, who then lost to the Greeks all between 700bc-300bc. That being said, native Africans could still be in positions of power during these periods, and the general population was probably a mix of natives, foreigners. and multi-continental offspring

its funny because the whole article contradicts itself, how could they have more of a origin in western asia when the haplogroup showed a more east african origin..

these cacs full of shyt..