ejthompson23
Vagabon
Ok breh
So any bih can go down 10-20-30 years and accuse me of sexual assault with no proof and it's up to me to prove that I didn't do it? and y'all nikkas cool with that?
Ok breh
He's been banned from malls for harassment. He's had multiple flings with teenaged girls. What do you mean "Y'all cool with that?" Yes I'm VERY cool with the fallout. Why are you defending this man?I have no problems with it these hoes waited 30-40 years to accuse him of "misconduct"...why the long wait? Which is coincidentally right before an election...and an accusation is enough to kill careers now? Not a conviction, no proof, just an accusation...y'all cool with that?
Because nobody should be put in jail/lose job/have life ruined based of an accusation...bring proof...if he did all that shyt, prove it...the justice system is supposed to be innocent until PROVEN guilty, not until accused guilty...He's been banned from malls for harassment. He's had multiple flings with teenaged girls. What do you mean "Y'all cool with that?" Yes I'm VERY cool with the fallout. Why are you defending this man?
So any bih can go down 10-20-30 years and accuse me of sexual assault with no proof and it's up to me to prove that I didn't do it? and y'all nikkas cool with that?
If they have proof, press charges...simple as that... all I've heard is Roy Moore been "accused"...what's the proof? A 49 year old bytch saying 35 years ago he groped her that's all it takes to have a nikka resign now? y'all caping for these hoes? Next time it might be one of you nikkas who gets accused by a bytch y'all fukked 10 years ago off Myspace....would y'all easily believe them then?Don' you fukking understand that the people coming out the woodwork has definative proof of the rape and molestations??? Why do you think the accused remains silent... is because they are fukking busted... Why you caping for these sick dudes man??? You defending dudes like harvey weinstein had manhattan DA's on his payroll to make these claims go away
Burden of proof and presumption of innocence only applies to criminal defendants. If Moore is so pressed, he can sue the Washington Post and the local papers and he can open himself up to discovery and he can see the evidence against him.Yo we can't let a nikka (regardless of political party) to have his life ruined based on an accusation...what's the burden of proof? the person making the accusation simply has to make it...no proof, nothing...women already lie about falsely being raped why are the accusations enough to make a nikka resign or lose jobs? sorry I dnt take these women's words for it...produce proof or GTFOH
Why can't he ignore the allegations? if these women are not lying, bring proof and have him charged...anything else is just he say she say that shouldn't count for shyt...Burden of proof and presumption of innocence only applies to criminal defendants. If Moore is so pressed, he can sue the Washington Post and the local papers and he can open himself up to discovery and he can see the evidence against him.