How Can Something Go Against Nature If Nature, Itself, Has No Actual Purpose?

[Knuckles Red]

I've seen, multiple times on here, posters commenting that homosexuality, "goes against nature." The example is usually that two men/women can't produce a child. That is true, but to say that homosexuality goes against nature implies that nature (evolution/biology) has an ACTUAL purpose outside of the ones we, as human beings, have attached to it. Of course there is the natural drive to reproduce, and we see these patterns all throughout the animal kingdom, but there is no ACTUAL purpose of life. There is no ACTUAL purpose of human life. It just is. So how can something go against nature if nature, itself, has no actual purpose?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Gays don't bother me on these principles:

1. Religion is bullshyt
2. It doesn't bother me
3. It doesn't seem to bother consenting adults
4. Theres tons of other shyt I find physically repulsive/unappealing/uninteresting, but I don't invest my effort into combating it
5. If theres no apparent problems, theres no need to oppose it.

 

[The Oracle]

I've seen, multiple times on here, posters commenting that homosexuality, "goes against nature." The example is usually that two men/women can't produce a child. That is true, but to say that homosexuality goes against nature implies that nature (evolution/biology) has an ACTUAL purpose outside of the ones we, as human beings, have attached to it. Of course there is the natural drive to reproduce, and we see these patterns all throughout the animal kingdom, but there is no ACTUAL purpose of life. There is no ACTUAL purpose of human life. It just is. So how can something go against nature if nature, itself, has no actual purpose?

reproduction is the purpose. it goes against nature in the sense that their union doesn't create offspring.

 

[010101]

word
what life was
what life is
what life will be aren't guaranteed to follow the same patterns
do what you feel
live and let live

*

 

[MaxBundles]

Though i could care less about them or what they do, homosexuality is against nature. I don't care how you try and rationalize and reason it

 

[Knuckles Red]

reproduction is the purpose. it goes against nature in the sense that their union doesn't create offspring.

What is the purpose of reproduction?

 

[Taharqa]

What is the purpose of reproduction?

 

[Knuckles Red]

Though i could care less about them or what they do, homosexuality is against nature. I don't care how you try and rationalize and reason it

How?

 

[ba'al]

OP could've made a better argument by saying that most humans in the modern age go against nature in some sense. Having sex outside of the vagina isn't nature. Sex for humans is mostly pleasure and not nature. Modern humans aren't nature oriented all around.

 

[b_low_brown]

reproduction is the purpose. it goes against nature in the sense that their union doesn't create offspring.

Neither does protected sex

Ban condoms?

 

[YaBoy]

I've seen, multiple times on here, posters commenting that homosexuality, "goes against nature." The example is usually that two men/women can't produce a child. That is true, but to say that homosexuality goes against nature implies that nature (evolution/biology) has an ACTUAL purpose outside of the ones we, as human beings, have attached to it. Of course there is the natural drive to reproduce, and we see these patterns all throughout the animal kingdom, but there is no ACTUAL purpose of life. There is no ACTUAL purpose of human life. It just is. So how can something go against nature if nature, itself, has no actual purpose?

 

[thekingsmen]

WTF are these coli kats smoking?

 

[thekingsmen]

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

I don't know about homosexuality. But that Transgender shyt is some crazy bullshyt.

 

[NotAnFBIagent]

living things are designed to survive and reproduce so in that sense it is going against nature